Technical perspective: By the end of the decade, we will deliver universal, fully fault-tolerant quantum computing
By Dr. Harry Buhrman, Chief Scientist for Algorithms and Innovation, and Dr. Chris Langer, Fellow
This week, we confirm what has been implied by the rapid pace of our recent technical progress as we reveal a major acceleration in our hardware road map. By the end of the decade, our accelerated hardware roadmap will deliver a fully fault-tolerant and universal quantum computer capable of executing millions of operations on hundreds of logical qubits.
The next major milestone on our accelerated roadmap is Quantinuum Helios™, Powered by Honeywell, a device that will definitively push beyond classical capabilities in 2025. That sets us on a path to our fifth-generation system, Quantinuum Apollo™, a machine that delivers scientific advantage and a commercial tipping point this decade.
What is Apollo?
We are committed to continually advancing the capabilities of our hardware over prior generations, and Apollo makes good on that promise. It will offer:
- Thousands of physical qubits
- Physical error rate of 10-4
- All of our most competitive features: all-to-all connectivity, low crosstalk, mid-circuit measurement and qubit re-use
- Conditional logic
- Real-time classical co-compute
- Physical variable angle 1 qubit and 2 qubit gates
- Hundreds of logical qubits
- Logical error rates better than 10-6 with analysis based on recent literature estimating as low as 10-10
By leveraging our all-to-all connectivity and low error rates, we expect to enjoy significant efficiency gains in terms of fault-tolerance, including single-shot error correction (which saves time) and high-rate and high-distance Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes (which mean more logical qubits, with stronger error correction capabilities, can be made from a smaller number of physical qubits).
Studies of several efficient QEC codes already suggest we can enjoy logical error rates much lower than our target 10-6 – we may even be able to reach 10-10, which enables exploration of even more complex problems of both industrial and scientific interest.
Error correcting code exploration is only just beginning – we anticipate discoveries of even more efficient codes. As new codes are developed, Apollo will be able to accommodate them, thanks to our flexible high-fidelity architecture. The bottom line is that Apollo promises fault-tolerant quantum advantage sooner, with fewer resources.
Like all our computers, Apollo is based on the quantum charged coupled device (QCCD) architecture. Here, each qubit’s information is stored in the atomic states of a single ion. Laser beams are applied to the qubits to perform operations such as gates, initialization, and measurement. The lasers are applied to individual qubits or co-located qubit pairs in dedicated operation zones. Qubits are held in place using electromagnetic fields generated by our ion trap chip. We move the qubits around in space by dynamically changing the voltages applied to the chip. Through an alternating sequence of qubit rearrangements via movement followed by quantum operations, arbitrary circuits with arbitrary connectivity can be executed.
The ion trap chip in Apollo will host a 2D array of trapping locations. It will be fabricated using standard CMOS processing technology and controlled using standard CMOS electronics. The 2D grid architecture enables fast and scalable qubit rearrangement and quantum operations – a critical competitive advantage. The Apollo architecture is scalable to the significantly larger systems we plan to deliver in the next decade.
What is Apollo good for?
Apollo’s scaling of very stable physical qubits and native high-fidelity gates, together with our advanced error correcting and fault tolerant techniques will establish a quantum computer that can perform tasks that do not run (efficiently) on any classical computer. We already had a first glimpse of this in our recent work sampling the output of random quantum circuits on H2, where we performed 100x better than competitors who performed the same task while using 30,000x less power than a classical supercomputer. But with Apollo we will travel into uncharted territory.
The flexibility to use either thousands of qubits for shorter computations (up to 10k gates) or hundreds of qubits for longer computations (from 1 million to 1 billion gates) make Apollo a versatile machine with unprecedented quantum computational power. We expect the first application areas will be in scientific discovery; particularly the simulation of quantum systems. While this may sound academic, this is how all new material discovery begins and its value should not be understated. This era will lead to discoveries in materials science, high-temperature superconductivity, complex magnetic systems, phase transitions, and high energy physics, among other things.
In general, Apollo will advance the field of physics to new heights while we start to see the first glimmers of distinct progress in chemistry and biology. For some of these applications, users will employ Apollo in a mode where it offers thousands of qubits for relatively short computations; e.g. exploring the magnetism of materials. At other times, users may want to employ significantly longer computations for applications like chemistry or topological data analysis.
But there is more on the horizon. Carefully crafted AI models that interact seamlessly with Apollo will be able to squeeze all the “quantum juice” out and generate data that was hitherto unavailable to mankind. We anticipate using this data to further the field of AI itself, as it can be used as training data.
The era of scientific (quantum) discovery and exploration will inevitably lead to commercial value. Apollo will be the centerpiece of this commercial tipping point where use-cases will build on the value of scientific discovery and support highly innovative commercially viable products.
Very interestingly, we will uncover applications that we are currently unaware of. As is always the case with disruptive new technology, Apollo will run currently unknown use-cases and applications that will make perfect sense once we see them. We are eager to co-develop these with our customers in our unique co-creation program.
How do we get there?
Today, System Model H2 is our most advanced commercial quantum computer, providing 56 physical qubits with physical two-qubit gate errors less than 10-3. System Model H2, like all our systems, is based on the QCCD architecture.
Starting from where we are today, our roadmap progresses through two additional machines prior to Apollo. The Quantinuum Helios™ system, which we are releasing in 2025, will offer around 100 physical qubits with two-qubit gate errors less than 5x10-4. In addition to expanded qubit count and better errors, Helios makes two departures from H2. First, Helios will use 137Ba+ qubits in contrast to the 171Yb+ qubits used in our H1 and H2 systems. This change enables lower two-qubit gate errors and less complex laser systems with lower cost. Second, for the first time in a commercial system, Helios will use junction-based qubit routing. The result will be a “twice-as-good" system: Helios will offer roughly 2x more qubits with 2x lower two-qubit gate errors while operating more than 2x faster than our 56-qubit H2 system.
After Helios we will introduce Quantinuum Sol™, our first commercially available 2D-grid-based quantum computer. Sol will offer hundreds of physical qubits with two-qubit gate errors less than 2x10-4, operating approximately 2x faster than Helios. Sol being a fully 2D-grid architecture is the scalability launching point for the significant size increase planned for Apollo.
Opportunity for early value creation discovery in Helios and Sol
Thanks to Sol’s low error rates, users will be able to execute circuits with up to 10,000 quantum operations. The usefulness of Helios and Sol may be extended with a combination of quantum error detection (QED) and quantum error mitigation (QEM). For example, the [[k+2, k, 2]] iceberg code is a light-weight QED code that encodes k+2 physical qubits into k logical qubits and only uses an additional 2 ancilla qubits. This low-overhead code is well-suited for Helios and Sol because it offers the non-Clifford variable angle entangling ZZ-gate directly without the overhead of magic state distillation. The errors Iceberg fails to detect are already ~10x lower than our physical errors, and by applying a modest run-time overhead to discard detected failures, the effective error in the computation can be further reduced. Combining QED with QEM, a ~10x reduction in the effective error may be possible while maintaining run-time overhead at modest levels and below that of full-blown QEC.
Why accelerate our roadmap now?
Our new roadmap is an acceleration over what we were previously planning. The benefits of this are obvious: Apollo brings the commercial tipping point sooner than we previously thought possible. This acceleration is made possible by a set of recent breakthroughs.
First, we solved the “wiring problem”: we demonstrated that trap chip control is scalable using our novel center-to-left-right (C2LR) protocol and broadcasting shared control signals to multiple electrodes. This demonstration of qubit rearrangement in a 2D geometry marks the most advanced ion trap built, containing approximately 40 junctions. This trap was deployed to 3 different testbeds in 2 different cities and operated with 2 different collections of dual-ion-species, and all 3 cases were a success. These demonstrations showed that the footprint of the most complex parts of the trap control stay constant as the number of qubits scales up. This gives us the confidence that Sol, with approximately 100 junctions, will be a success.
Second, we continue to reduce our two-qubit physical gate errors. Today, H1 and H2 have two-qubit gate errors less than 1x10-3 across all pairs of qubits. This is the best in the industry and is a key ingredient in our record >2 million quantum volume. Our systems are the most benchmarked in the industry, and we stand by our data - making it all publicly available. Recently, we observed an 8x10-4 two-qubit gate error in our Helios development test stand in 137Ba+, and we’ve seen even better error rates in other testbeds. We are well on the path to meeting the 5x10-4 spec in Helios next year.
Third, the all-to-all connectivity offered by our systems enables highly efficient QEC codes. In Microsoft’s recent demonstration, our H2 system with 56 physical qubits was used to generate 12 logical qubits at distance 4. This work demonstrated several experiments, including repeated rounds of error correction where the error in the final result was ~10x lower than the physical circuit baseline.
In conclusion, through a combination of advances in hardware readiness and QEC, we have line-of-sight to Apollo by the end of the decade, a fully fault-tolerant quantum advantaged machine. This will be a commercial tipping point: ushering in an era of scientific discovery in physics, materials, chemistry, and more. Along the way, users will have the opportunity to discover new enabling use cases through quantum error detection and mitigation in Helios and Sol.
Quantinuum has the best quantum computers today and is on the path to offering fault-tolerant useful quantum computation by the end of the decade.
About Quantinuum
Quantinuum, the world’s largest integrated quantum company, pioneers powerful quantum computers and advanced software solutions. Quantinuum’s technology drives breakthroughs in materials discovery, cybersecurity, and next-gen quantum AI. With over 500 employees, including 370+ scientists and engineers, Quantinuum leads the quantum computing revolution across continents.
- Our team, in partnership with HQS Quantum Simulations, just published what we believe to be the most accurate1 large-scale quantum simulation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) to date, pointing the way to new frontiers in computational chemistry.
- NMR is a widely used analytical technique that can require significant computational costs to interpret, costs that can balloon quickly on classical systems.
- In this result, the joint team ran an end-to-end simulation on System Model H2, reproducing key spectral features that previous demonstrations were unable to capture.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is one of the most powerful analytical techniques in modern science. From identifying drug candidates to understanding battery materials, it allows researchers to probe the local atomic structure of molecules and materials with remarkable precision.
Interpreting NMR experiments often requires simulations that are just as challenging as the experiments themselves. As the number of interacting nuclear spins grows, the computational cost of simulating these systems increases exponentially on classical computers. Quantum computers, which naturally represent and evolve quantum states, offer a fundamentally different approach.
In our latest work, we demonstrate the most accurate large-scale digital NMR simulation performed on quantum hardware to date. Using Quantinuum's System Model H2, we carried out an end-to-end simulation of a classically challenging NMR experiment, reproducing key spectral features that previous hardware demonstrations were unable to capture.
Why simulate NMR?
NMR is a cornerstone of chemical analysis. Researchers use it to determine molecular structures, characterize new compounds, and study how atoms interact with one another.
These capabilities make NMR indispensable across industry. In pharmaceutical research, NMR helps identify and characterize drug candidates. In materials science, it reveals the local atomic environments that determine material properties. Battery researchers, for example, use NMR to study cathode materials such as lithium cobalt oxide, allowing them to monitor how the material changes during charging and discharging and ultimately improve battery performance.
In many cases, the experimental spectrum is only part of the story. Simulations help scientists interpret complex spectra by revealing which atomic interactions give rise to the observed peaks. They provide the link between an experimental measurement and the underlying molecular structure.
The classical challenge and the quantum solution
The difficulty lies in the physics.
An NMR experiment measures the dynamics of interacting nuclear spins. Every additional spin rapidly increases the size of the quantum state that must be represented (in the case of a spin-½ particle, every spin doubles the state). As a result, exact classical simulations become exponentially more expensive as the system size grows.
Today's best classical methods are remarkably sophisticated. Exact simulations are typically limited to systems of around 25 interacting spins, while advanced approximation techniques can often extend calculations to roughly 40–50 spins for many practical problems.
Those approximations have made classical NMR software extraordinarily effective for conventional liquid-state spectroscopy. In fact, our collaborators on this project are developing one of the leading classical simulation packages and noted that, despite the success of our quantum experiment, the current spectral resolution is still insufficient for routine use by practicing spectroscopists. Resolving the fine structure needed for many real-world analyses would require substantially longer simulations—and therefore much deeper quantum circuits than current hardware can yet support.
This highlights both the progress and the remaining challenge. Quantum computers are beginning to produce meaningful NMR spectra, but practical utility will require larger quantum computers and increased simulation depth.
In the longer term, interacting spin systems are among the most natural applications for quantum computers. Instead of storing the exponentially large quantum state explicitly, a quantum computer represents it directly in its physical qubits. For spin-½ nuclei, the mapping is particularly efficient: each nuclear spin corresponds directly to a single qubit. Higher-spin nuclei require only a small number of additional qubits.
This does not eliminate every computational challenge—longer simulations still require deeper quantum circuits—but it avoids the exponential memory bottleneck that limits classical simulation.
For NMR, this makes quantum simulation an especially compelling long-term application.
Our experiment
Working with collaborators at HQS Quantum Simulations, we implemented a complete quantum workflow for simulating an NMR experiment on Quantinuum's H2 trapped-ion quantum computer.
Rather than stopping at Hamiltonian simulation alone, we reproduced the entire computational pipeline:
- constructing the nuclear spin Hamiltonian,
- compiling efficient quantum circuits,
- simulating the spin dynamics through Trotterized real-time evolution,
- applying targeted error-suppression techniques,
- reconstructing the free induction decay, and
- generating the final NMR spectrum through Fourier analysis.
The benchmark molecule, 1,2-di-tert-butyl-diphosphane, is a well-known challenge for NMR simulation. After applying hardware-efficient model reduction, we simulated an effective 21-spin Hamiltonian using a 42-qubit (21 system qubits and 21 ancilla qubits) computation on System Model H2.
Our deepest circuits reached over 1,400 two-qubit gates and simulated 70 Trotter steps, corresponding to approximately 29 ms of physical evolution time.
Most importantly, the resulting spectrum reproduced the key benchmark features of the classical reference calculation, including a characteristic double-peak structure that previous quantum hardware demonstrations had failed to recover.
This represents the most complete hardware demonstration of digital NMR simulation reported to date.
Why trapped ions mattered
Achieving this result depended not only on the quantum algorithm but also on the underlying hardware.
Large Hamiltonian simulations require long, high-fidelity quantum circuits. Quantinuum's trapped-ion architecture provides all-to-all qubit connectivity, high-fidelity gates, and effective error-suppression techniques that allowed us to preserve the spectroscopic features throughout the computation.
The close agreement between hardware, emulator, and classical reference calculations demonstrates that deep quantum simulations of chemically meaningful systems are becoming increasingly feasible on today's hardware.
Looking ahead
To make quantum NMR genuinely useful for practicing spectroscopists, future systems will need substantially deeper circuits.
Our experiment simulated approximately 29 ms of evolution time, producing spectral features with a resolution of roughly 0.07 ppm, a very promising start.
Reaching that scale will require continued improvements in hardware fidelity, error correction, and quantum algorithms.
Nevertheless, this work demonstrates that digital quantum simulation of realistic NMR experiments is no longer purely theoretical. It establishes a practical end-to-end workflow, validates key algorithmic techniques, and shows that quantum computers can already reproduce chemically meaningful spectral signatures.
As quantum hardware continues to improve, applications such as molecular spectroscopy, materials characterization, and chemical simulation are becoming increasingly realistic targets for practical quantum computing.
1 Based on a study of existing literature
- In a recent independent study by the Julich Supercomputing Center, Quantinuum’s trapped-ion systems outperformed superconducting processors in tests of fault tolerant operations.
- Testing small chunks of circuits that would be used in larger QEC workflows, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately 10x lower effective hardware error compared to superconducting systems.
- Quantinuum’s flexible connectivity enabled tests across three error-correcting code families, compared to just one for superconducting systems, illustrating the expanding options for advancing fault tolerance with our QCCD architecture.
The demands of fault tolerance are bringing Quantinuum’s advantages into sharper focus.
In a new independent study from the Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Quantinuum’s Helios demonstrated an approximately order-of-magnitude advantage over superconducting hardware in tests of operations essential to quantum error correction. More precisely, Helios’ effective hardware error was approximately 13 times lower at 30 data qubits and eight times lower at 50 data qubits than the comparable superconducting result.
The advantage extended to architectural flexibility. Quantinuum’s systems supported tests across three error-correcting code families, while connectivity and control restrictions limited implementation to only one on the superconducting devices evaluated.
These findings build on earlier independent research by the same organization highlighting Quantinuum’s physical-level performance. As we have argued, the NISQ era is coming to an end. The demands of error correction are bringing our architectural differences into sharper focus—and this study provides further evidence of Quantinuum’s advantage.
Error correction exposes performance gaps
A fault-tolerant quantum computer must repeatedly detect and correct errors to protect the computation in progress. That requires reliable mid-circuit measurements, conditional operations, and real-time coordinated scheduling.
In a direct comparison, introducing mid-circuit measurement caused substantially greater degradation on the superconducting processors compared to the Quantinuum systems.
That difference matters. Mid-circuit measurement must be repeated throughout fault-tolerant computations. Their (potential) performance penalty directly affects how much computation a machine can sustain.
Helios demonstrated strong performance under those demands, extending its advantage beyond the physical layer into circuits exercising essential error-correction capabilities.
Connectivity expands the options
The study also highlighted how architectural restrictions affect which error-correction structures hardware can implement directly.
On Quantinuum’s systems, researchers ran tests exploring the surface-code, triangular color-code, and a bivariate-bicycle qLDPC code. In contrast, the superconducting devices evaluated were only able to explore the surface code due to device constraints.
This is because Quantinuum’s QCCD architecture offers greater flexibility: mobile qubits enable codes that require higher connectivity than is allowed on traditional superconducting processors. Ultimately, this gives researchers more freedom to explore multiple codes—and more opportunities to reduce the qubit and time overheads of fault tolerance.
Building on an architectural advantage
The Jülich study provides independent evidence that Quantinuum’s architectural choices deliver advantages for operations essential to fault tolerance. It also reveals performance and implementation gaps in the superconducting systems tested.
We intend to extend that lead. Our investments in fidelity, flexible connectivity, and integrated control are foundations for increasingly capable machines.
As error-correction workloads become more demanding, those capabilities become more consequential. Quantinuum is building to meet that challenge—and to keep raising the performance bar.
Thirty participants gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge, for an intensive five-day programme exploring how quantum computers can be used to model chemical systems.
By: Duncan Gowland, Senior Advanced R&D Scientist at Quantinuum
For 30 researchers who gathered at Newnham College, Cambridge this September, that question shaped an intensive five-day programme.
Quantinuum’s first InQuanto Summer School, supported by the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre (NQCC), combined lectures, hands-on workshops, and mini-projects to help participants connect fundamental concepts with practical research. By the end of the week, participants were applying those ideas to problems ranging from molecular electronic structure to quantum state-preparation circuits.
Applying quantum computing to chemistry can be challenging because it draws on expertise from a broad range of areas, including electronic structure theory, quantum algorithms, software, hardware, noise modelling, and resource estimation. Researchers often enter the field with deep knowledge of one or two of these areas but less familiarity with the others.
A key objective of the course was to help researchers from computational chemistry and quantum computing build stronger foundations, develop a shared language, and deepen their understanding of adjacent disciplines.
For researchers beginning work at this intersection, that shared understanding can make it easier to identify where to start, which assumptions to challenge, and when to seek expertise from another discipline.
Bringing Theory and Practice Together
The programme began with lectures on the foundations of quantum computing, followed by pen-and-paper and computational exercises in the afternoon. On Day 2, lectures and workshops introduced the electronic structure problem: how quantum chemists describe the behaviour of electrons in molecules.
Students then brought these two foundations together by studying fermion-to-qubit mappings, which translate chemistry problems into a form that quantum computers can process, before moving on to the measurement of chemistry observables and the construction of quantum algorithms.
Learners were given free access to InQuanto, Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry software platform designed to accelerate research in fields such as chemistry and condensed matter physics using quantum computers. InQuanto supported the lectures as a broad, well-documented, and thoroughly tested platform that enabled students to explore and reinforce complex concepts through hands-on experience.
Later in the week, attention shifted to state-of-the-art considerations: how to build useful chemical models, make the best use of current quantum devices, and think about how quantum algorithms for chemistry might develop over the next five to ten years.
The students, who travelled from around the world to Cambridge, brought a remarkable range of backgrounds and experience. The material was pitched at roughly first-year doctoral level, for participants with at least a year of experience in one core area and some Python skills. Even with this experience, participants benefited from exposure to other disciplines and from the practical expertise of Quantinuum’s quantum chemistry team—which brings years of experience working with industrial including BMW Group, TotalEnergies, NVIDIA, and Pfizer.
Throughout the week, participants were highly engaged in lectures and brought a thoughtful, collaborative approach to the workshop exercises. Discussions continued throughout the week, from coffee breaks to lunches and dinners, creating valuable opportunities to exchange ideas and experiences.
A particular highlight was the mini-project work. In just a day and a half, participants tackled a wide range of problems and produced impressive prototype solutions. The projects concluded with a poster-style session, where the quality of discussion was exceptional. Examples included state-preparation programmes using mid-circuit measurement in Guppy; investigations of active-space selection and quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) for the chromium dimer; and the use of the atomic valence active space (AVAS) approach to identify active spaces and perform resource estimation for myoglobin.
One participant reimplemented their research on efficient state-preparation circuits based on orbital entanglement in InQuanto and compared the performance of those circuits with the platform’s efficient ansatz methods on the Helios emulator. It was rewarding to see participants apply these tools to their own research challenges and explore new approaches to quantum chemistry.
With Support from the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre
This rewarding week was made possible through the support of the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre, whose partnership helped bring the programme to life, and by the contributions of colleagues across Quantinuum. The teaching team brought together experts from our quantum chemistry, compiler, and error-correction teams, who developed the course materials, delivered lectures, and led the workshops.
Above all, the programme demonstrated the value of bringing researchers together around a shared foundation, practical tools, and opportunities to learn from one another. We look forward to seeing how participants build on these ideas in their future research.
Interested in future training opportunities, workshops, and community events from Quantinuum? Join QNET to stay connected with the latest updates, resources, and opportunities to engage with the quantum computing community.